The Planning Board re-opened the floor last night to citizen feedback on the proposed overlay for the redevelopment of the Temple Shalom property. The Temple Shalom, which is in financial straits, has engaged Coffman Realty to develop a plan for the property. The proposal they put forth includes a pharmacy, a separate professional building that would house additional business/retail tenants, and a new, smaller temple.
Many local residents oppose the plan. The chief concerns being a) increased traffic in an area where traffic is already high and traffic management is poor, and b) the impact on property values. Blue Hill Terrace was identified by several residents as being especially problematic and a public safety issue now, never mind with the additional traffic a commercial development might bring. Many neighbors expressed a desire for the Temple to stay; but that this plan was not the solution. They feel the plan lacks definition, specificity, and that the Temple and Coffman did not seek neighborhood input early enough in the planning process.
Proponents of the development argued that having the development would provide convenience to all residents of the area. Currently, residents of the west side of town need to drive to get basic staples and sundries. A commercial area would also provide employment to neighborhood high school students . Many expressed optimism that a solution could be found if they continued to work together.
Some participants identified Mr. Whitside’s proposal as a positive step. Mr. Whiteside, a member of the Planning Board, who in the previous meeting had said the plan was “devoid of necessary standards as a matter of zoning,” reiterated that the plan had “significant problems that gave me pause.” He drafted a zoning proposal that might serve as a “framework” in which the Temple and commercial use could work. He identified the following characteristics: a buffer zone of green space 25′ wide, a single entrance from Blue Hill Ave, 6:00AM – 10PM hours of operation, no overnight parking, buildings limited to 15,000 sq feet, and 60 parking spaces allocated for each building. Key to his proposal would be an institutional commercial committee appointed by Board of Selectmen comprised of 2 residents, a selectman, and 2 architects, one of whom would be a landscape architect.
This session of the board marked the end of public comment on the issue. The Board will next convene on 3/26th at which time the Temple and Coffman Realty will present a response to community feedback.
RELATED LINKS: